» Uncategorized

SUPREME COURT ISSUES FAVORABLE DECISION FOR FIRM’S CLIENT IN GEORGIA V. PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG INC.

On April 27, the Supreme Court issued a favorable decision for the firm’s client in Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org Inc. Eric Citron argued for the respondent. In a 5-4 decision written by Justice Roberts, the court affirmed the lower court&#… Read More
Read More
Categories: Uncategorized

LISA JING JOINS THE FIRM

Goldstein & Russell is pleased to announce that Lisa Jing has joined the firm as an Associate. Lisa Jing joins the firm between clerkships with the Honorable Lorna G. Schofield of the United States District Court for the Southern District o… Read More
Read More
Categories: Uncategorized

SUPREME COURT ISSUES FAVORABLE DECISION FOR FIRM'S CLIENTS IN CITGO ASPHALT REFINING CO. V. FRESCATI SHIPPING CO., LTD.

On March 30, the Supreme Court issued a favorable decision for the firm’s clients in CITGO Asphalt Refining Co. v. Frescati Shipping Co., Ltd. Thomas Goldstein argued for the respondents. In a 7-2 decision written by Justice Sotomayor, th… Read More
Read More
Categories: Uncategorized

ERIC CITRON ARGUES FOR THE RESPONDENT IN GEORGIA V. PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC.

On December 2, Eric Citron argued his first case before the Supreme Court on behalf of the respondent in Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org Inc., a case concerning whether the government edicts doctrine extends to—and thus renders uncopyrightable—wo… Read More
Read More
Categories: Uncategorized

TOM GOLDSTEIN ARGUES FOR THE RESPONDENTS IN CITGO ASPHALT REFINING CO. V. FRESCATI SHIPPING CO. LTD.

On November 5, Tom Goldstein argued before the Supreme Court on behalf of the respondents in CITGO Asphalt Refining Co. v. Frescati Shipping Co., Ltd., a case concerning whether, under federal maritime law, a safe-berth clause in a voyage charter co… Read More
Read More
Categories: Uncategorized

SARAH HARRINGTON ARGUES FOR RESPONDENT IN KANSAS V. GLOVER

On November 4, Sarah Harrington argued before the Supreme Court on behalf of the respondent in Kansas v. Glover, a case concerning whether, for purposes of an investigative stop under the Fourth Amendment, it is reasonable for an officer to suspect… Read More
Read More
Categories: Uncategorized

SUPREME COURT ISSUES FAVORABLE DECISION FOR FIRM’S CLIENTS IN AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP. V. DEVRIES

On March 19, 2019, the Supreme Court issued a favorable decision for the firm’s clients in Air and Liquid Systems Corp. v. DeVries. Thomas Goldstein argued for the respondents. In a 6-3 decision written by Justice Kavanaugh, the court affirmed… Read More
Read More
Categories: Uncategorized

KEVIN RUSSELL ARGUES FOR PETITIONERS IN MOZILLA CORPORATION, ET AL. V. FCC

On February 1, Kevin Russell argued before the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Mozilla Corporation, et al. v. FCC, on behalf of public interest groups and internet companies challenging the FCC’s repeal of net… Read More
Read More
Categories: Uncategorized

GOLDSTEIN & RUSSELL NAMED TO NLJ 2018 APPELLATE HOT LIST

Goldstein & Russell, P.C. has been named to the National Law Journal’s 2018 Appellate Hot List, which recognizes 22 firms “for their success before the U.S. Supreme Court and federal appeals courts.” Eric Citron was profiled by… Read More
Read More
Categories: Uncategorized

THOMAS GOLDSTEIN ARGUES FOR THE RESPONDENTS IN AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP V. DEVRIES

On October 10, Thomas Goldstein argued before the Supreme Court on behalf of the respondents in Air and Liquid Systems Corp. v. DeVries, a case concerning whether products-liability defendants can be held liable under maritime law for injuries caus… Read More
Read More
Categories: Uncategorized

Areas Of Practice

Goldstein & Russell, P.C. specializes in representing clients at all stages before the U.S. Supreme Court.  Collectively, the firm’s lawyers have argued 79 cases on the merits and have filed in… Read More
While focused on representing clients in the Supreme Court, the firm also serves as counsel to clients in the federal courts of appeals.  Like its Supreme Court practice, the firm’s experience in t… Read More