Firm News

TOM GOLDSTEIN ARGUES FOR THE RESPONDENTS IN CITGO ASPHALT REFINING CO. V. FRESCATI SHIPPING CO. LTD.

On November 5, Tom Goldstein argued before the Supreme Court on behalf of the respondents in CITGO Asphalt Refining Co. v. Frescati Shipping Co., Ltd., a case concerning whether, under federal maritime law, a safe-berth clause in a voyage charter co… Read More
Read More
Categories: Uncategorized

SARAH HARRINGTON ARGUES FOR RESPONDENT IN KANSAS V. GLOVER

On November 4, Sarah Harrington argued before the Supreme Court on behalf of the respondent in Kansas v. Glover, a case concerning whether, for purposes of an investigative stop under the Fourth Amendment, it is reasonable for an officer to suspect… Read More
Read More
Categories: Uncategorized

SUPREME COURT ISSUES FAVORABLE DECISION FOR FIRM’S CLIENTS IN AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP. V. DEVRIES

On March 19, 2019, the Supreme Court issued a favorable decision for the firm’s clients in Air and Liquid Systems Corp. v. DeVries. Thomas Goldstein argued for the respondents. In a 6-3 decision written by Justice Kavanaugh, the court affirmed… Read More
Read More
Categories: Uncategorized

KEVIN RUSSELL ARGUES FOR PETITIONERS IN MOZILLA CORPORATION, ET AL. V. FCC

On February 1, Kevin Russell argued before the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Mozilla Corporation, et al. v. FCC, on behalf of public interest groups and internet companies challenging the FCC’s repeal of net… Read More
Read More
Categories: Uncategorized

GOLDSTEIN & RUSSELL NAMED TO NLJ 2018 APPELLATE HOT LIST

Goldstein & Russell, P.C. has been named to the National Law Journal’s 2018 Appellate Hot List, which recognizes 22 firms “for their success before the U.S. Supreme Court and federal appeals courts.” Eric Citron was profiled by… Read More
Read More
Categories: Uncategorized

THOMAS GOLDSTEIN ARGUES FOR THE RESPONDENTS IN AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP V. DEVRIES

On October 10, Thomas Goldstein argued before the Supreme Court on behalf of the respondents in Air and Liquid Systems Corp. v. DeVries, a case concerning whether products-liability defendants can be held liable under maritime law for injuries caus… Read More
Read More
Categories: Uncategorized

DANIEL WOOFTER JOINS THE FIRM

Goldstein & Russell is pleased to announce that Daniel Woofter has joined the firm as an Associate. Daniel joins after clerking for the Honorable Pamela A. Harris of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals and the Honorable Judith E. Levy of the Dist… Read More
Read More
Categories: Uncategorized

FEDERAL CIRCUIT ISSUES FAVORABLE DECISION FOR FIRM'S CLIENT IN TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY V. EVERLIGHT ELECTRONICS

On July 25, 2018, the Federal Circuit issued a favorable decision for the firm’s clients in Trustees of Boston University v. Everlight Electronics, Co.  Kevin Russell argued in support of the Appellees, with Charles Davis assisting with the briefi… Read More
Read More
Categories: Uncategorized

SUPREME COURT ISSUES FAVORABLE DECISION FOR FIRM’S CLIENTS IN SOUTH DAKOTA V. WAYFAIR

On June 21, 2018, the Supreme Court issued a favorable decision for the firm’s clients in South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. Eric Citron was counsel for the petitioners. In a 5-4 decision written by Justice Kennedy, the court held that Quill Corp.… Read More
Read More
Categories: Uncategorized

SUPREME COURT ISSUES FAVORABLE DECISION FOR FIRM’S CLIENTS IN CYAN V. BEAVER COUNTRY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT FUND

On March 20, 2018, the Supreme Court issued a favorable decision for the firm’s clients in Cyan Inc., v. Beaver County Employees’ Retirement Fund. Thomas Goldstein argued for the respondents. In a unanimous decision written by Justice Kag… Read More
Read More
Categories: Uncategorized

Areas Of Practice

Goldstein & Russell, P.C. specializes in representing clients at all stages before the U.S. Supreme Court.  Collectively, the firm’s lawyers have argued 75 cases on the merits and have filed in… Read More
While focused on representing clients in the Supreme Court, the firm also serves as counsel to clients in the federal courts of appeals.  Like its Supreme Court practice, the firm’s experience in t… Read More