Firm News » Uncategorized

Supreme Court Holds That Plaintiffs’ State Law Securities Claims Can Go Forward

On February 26, 2014, the Supreme Court ruled 7-2 in favor of the firm’s clients in Chadboune & Parke LLP v. Troice. Tom Goldstein argued for the respondents. In an opinion written by Justice Breyer, the Court held that the Securities Litig… Read More
Read More
Categories: Uncategorized

Tom Goldstein Argues International Arbitration Case at Supreme Court

On December 2, Tom Goldstein argued on behalf of the petitioner in BG Group PLC v. Republic of Argentina, a case involving the distribution of authority between courts and arbitrators in international arbitration cases.   Read More
Read More
Categories: Uncategorized

Kevin Russell Argues for Respondent in Air Wisconsin Airlines Corp. v. Hoeper

On December 9, Kevin Russell argued before the Supreme Court on behalf of the respondent in Air Wisconsin Airlines Corp. v. Hoeper, a case concerning the scope of immunity under the Aviation and Transportation Security Act. Read More
Read More
Categories: Uncategorized

Tom Goldstein Argues Personal Jurisdictional Case before Supreme Court in Walden v. Fiore

On November 4, Tom Goldstein argued in the Supreme Court on behalf of the respondents in Walden v. Fiore, a case raising questions of personal jurisdiction and venue in suits against defendants who target out-of-state plaintiffs for an intentional to… Read More
Read More
Categories: Uncategorized

Tom Goldstein Opens New Term before Supreme Court

On October 7, the first day of October Term 2013, Tom Goldstein argued in the Supreme Court on behalf of the respondents in Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. Troice, a case concerning whether the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act (SLUSA) preclu… Read More
Read More
Categories: Uncategorized

Kevin Russell Argues before Supreme Court in Daimler AG v. Bauman

On October 15, Kevin Russell argued in the Supreme Court on behalf of the respondents in Daimler A.G. v. Bauman, a case concerning American courts’ personal jurisdiction over foreign companies that do business in the United States. Read More
Read More
Categories: Uncategorized

Supreme Court Grants Firm's Petition in International Arbitration Case

On June 10, the Court granted the firm’s cert. petition in BG Group PLC v. Republic of Argentina, a case addressing whether, in disputes involving a multi-staged dispute resolution process, a court or the arbitrator determines whether a precon… Read More
Read More
Categories: Uncategorized

Supreme Court Rules in Firm’s Favor in Immigration Case

On April 23, 2013, the Supreme Court ruled 7-2 in favor of the firm’s client in Moncrieffe v. Holder, a case involving the immigration consequences for distribution of a small amount of marijuana without remuneration, that Tom Goldstein argued… Read More
Read More
Categories: Uncategorized

Recent Oral Argument

On January 16, Tom Goldstein argued in the Supreme Court on behalf of the petitioners in City of Arlington, Texas, et al. v. Federal Communications Commission, a case addressing whether a court should apply Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. NRDC, Inc., to revi… Read More
Read More
Categories: Uncategorized

Court Rules in Firm's Favor

On January 9, 2013, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously in favor of the firm’s client in Already v. Nike., a case involving mootness standards that Tom Goldstein argued in November.  The Court ruled that a covenant not to enforce a trademark a… Read More
Read More
Categories: Uncategorized

Areas Of Practice

Goldstein & Russell, P.C. specializes in representing clients at all stages before the U.S. Supreme Court.  Collectively, the firm’s lawyers have argued 75 cases on the merits and have filed in… Read More
While focused on representing clients in the Supreme Court, the firm also serves as counsel to clients in the federal courts of appeals.  Like its Supreme Court practice, the firm’s experience in t… Read More
free porn free porn SILME SILERIM!!